Search results
5 results
Sort by:
Remaining or Going Private: Traditional and New Rationales
The going private transaction has been popular in the past and will likely continue in popularity, given the number of startup “exits.” In the alternative, companies could continue to remain private, as venture capital funding and mega-rounds give companies a way to operate privately and their founders to retain control. Traditional rationales were centered around public speculation and filing or disclosure requirements. I suggest that new rationales include control by founder/CEOs, although it is hard to be sure. In the future, there could be new trends, less founder-centric companies, and more rationales for remaining, or going, private.
A New Trend in Securities Fraud: Punishing People Who Do Bad Things
This article seeks to articulate a distinct view of federal securities law as it is increasingly used in non-traditional enforcement actions commenced to punish corporate bad behavior. This paper argues that these non-traditional enforcement mechanisms should be viewed with skepticism. This skepticism should not be misinterpreted as cynicism, as the author believes that these non-traditional enforcement actions are beneficial vehicles to accomplish the admirable governmental objective of “punishing people who do bad things.” However, the author recognizes that such use of securities law does not fall into a category of clearly defined criminal law and carries a significant risk of abuse. The author also recognizes the “admirable governmental objective” may be thwarted when it comes to private companies. Finally, the author is uneasy with the societal values conveyed when the government sanctions corporate misbehavior in the name of protecting shareholders from deception.
Basics of Securities Laws of Federal and Texas Securities Laws Compliance and Review of Available Exemption Processes
This paper will address basic issues for securities law compliance for an exempt offering of securities in the State of Texas. Set out below are the basic building blocks of federal and state securities requirements that with the principal purpose of guiding compliance with securities laws concerning the offering and sale of equity in a client’s business. Compliance may consider issues such as the client in choosing the form of business entity, identifying and quantifying the risk of the transaction, as well as assisting the client in identifying the nature of the investors most likely to consider an investment in the proposed transaction. This paper, however, will focus on an overview of how to comply, with some explanation about the history and thought processes involved, so as to help you off to a running start. I will focus on the most common federal exemption, since that is the most simple and common form of compliance (very easy to find templates and “go-bys”), and also makes state compliance the most straight forward. Other possibilities for compliance are listed, both for education and also to make you aware of other possible compliance regimes if the most common is not available or a good fit. This paper will not, however, be a compendium. For example issues such as what constitutes a “security,” or liabilities for issuers and their control persons, or principles of rescission (to fix a broken exemption) are all outside the scope of this paper.
Venture Capital: Funding a New or Growing Business
Although early-stage companies have numerous potential paths, many founders simply start with an innovative idea, apprehension about the immediate next steps, and big dreams about building a successful business. Only a select few will cash in on a massive exit or other sale transaction. While some companies initially can survive using the founder’s own money, many companies – especially high-growth potential companies (which are the focus of this article) – need significant investment capital to turn ideas and dreams into a real business. Success or failure in the early-stage financing process often is a keystone on which a high-growth potential company’s future depends. There are many variables to early-stage financing, and missteps during the process can haunt a company throughout its lifespan. When an early-stage company conducts this process in accordance with established norms, we have found that, among other things, financing tends to close quicker, valuations remain intact, and founders have better options for subsequent fundraising rounds.
Really Bad Lawyering costs client $240,000 per SEC
SEC Charges Broker-Dealer Nationwide Planning and Two Affiliated Investment Advisers with Violating Whistleblower Protection Rule