Log in
Site MapContact

Search results

16 results
Sort by:

Contract Drafting Building Blocks: Breach, Remedies, and Dispute Resolution

I often describe contract drafting as a “creative process.” A statement that has drawn unbelieving looks from many past students. But drafting a contract presents the opportunity to create a private body of law between two or more parties. That private body of law, along with any other applicable statutes, regulations, and common law, dictate how the parties will work together to achieve some common goal. To draft that document appropriately and in a way that helps the parties reach the goal, the lawyer has to think through the process of each party’s performance – the who, what, when, where, and how of each obligation, condition, or discretionary action. Once that process is complete, the lawyer drafts those obligations, conditions, and discretionary actions in a way that memorializes the parties’ intentions. I have also often told students that a major perk of a transactional practice (for me at least)is that your clients are typically happy to be working with you. They haven’t hired you because they are fighting with someone or at the beginning stages of litigation. Instead, the client is embarking on a new deal or relationship. Very often, one that brings sought-after potential and opportunity for the client. And in this situation, they are happy to have you on board.However, while we prefer to focus on the positive aspects of the transaction, we also know that part of that creative process includes consideration of what can go wrong. It is inevitable that a percentage (hopefully a very, very small percentage) of contracts we draft will end up in some type of dispute or litigation. Relationships go south or economic circumstances change for the parties, and the contract should address those potential situations. We have to think through what constitutes a default, when is termination of the agreement allowed, what are the consequences of that termination (both monetary and nonmonetary), and what are the remedies the parties may seek– specific, common law, or both.
Read More…

Annotated Covenants

Set forth below is a typical covenants section that would appear in a stock purchase agreement. Note that these covenants assume that defined terms are set forth in the rest of the agreement.
Read More…

Model Company Agreements for Closely Held LLCs

Records maintained by the Texas Secretary of State indicate that the limited liability company has become the entity of choice among Texas organizations. The office of the Texas Secretary of State reports that of the 374,301 certificates of formation filed for domestic for-profit entities in 2024, 348,753 (or approximately 93%) were limited liability companies, and of the 391,934 certificates of formation filed for domestic for-profit entities in 2023, 365,417 (or approximately 93%) were limited liability companies. It is often stated that one of the benefits of organizing an entity as a limited liability company is that this form of entity offers the owners and governing authority of the entity the flexibility to agree to provisions for the economic terms and governance that are more flexible than available with respect to a corporation. This is true, and indeed limited liability companies are sometimes used to create highly complex structures with multiple classes of ownership interests and highly customized provisions regarding management and governance of the entity, including complicated provisions for voting and management succession. However, given the large number of entities now being created as limited liability companies in Texas and other states, it is likely that many of these new entities are not entities with complex structures with multiple classes of ownership and complex bureaucracies for governance. Statistics compiled by the Internal Revenue Service show that for the tax year 2021 (the most recent year for which statistics are currently available), approximately 68% of the S corporation returns are for single-shareholder S corporations and approximately 24% have only two shareholders. The Internal Revenue Service does not publish similar statistics for limited liability companies, and single-member limited liability companies are typically disregarded entities that do not file tax returns. But if one assumes that most limited liability companies are closely held entities, then by analogy, it is likely that a large portion of limited liability companies have one or two owners. Therefore, it is much more likely that practitioners will find themselves needing to draft simple limited liability company agreements suitable for entities with one or two or a very few owners, rather than more complex documents. The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss models for governing agreements for limited liability companies when a simple structure is needed.
Read More…

Model Company Agreements

This paper was presented at the LLCs, LPs and Partnerships Seminar on July 13-14, 2017 in Austin, Texas. This paper has three appendixes, each of which has a model agreement. See below for the three example agreements.
Read More…