I often describe contract drafting as a “creative process.” A statement that has drawn unbelieving looks from many past students. But drafting a contract presents the opportunity to create a private body of law between two or more parties. That private body of law, along with any other applicable statutes, regulations, and common law, dictate how the parties will work together to achieve some common goal. To draft that document appropriately and in a way that helps the parties reach the goal, the lawyer has to think through the process of each party’s performance – the who, what, when, where, and how of each obligation, condition, or discretionary action. Once that process is complete, the lawyer drafts those obligations, conditions, and discretionary actions in a way that memorializes the parties’ intentions. I have also often told students that a major perk of a transactional practice (for me at least)is that your clients are typically happy to be working with you. They haven’t hired you because they are fighting with someone or at the beginning stages of litigation. Instead, the client is embarking on a new deal or relationship. Very often, one that brings sought-after potential and opportunity for the client. And in this situation, they are happy to have you on board.However, while we prefer to focus on the positive aspects of the transaction, we also know that part of that creative process includes consideration of what can go wrong. It is inevitable that a percentage (hopefully a very, very small percentage) of contracts we draft will end up in some type of dispute or litigation. Relationships go south or economic circumstances change for the parties, and the contract should address those potential situations. We have to think through what constitutes a default, when is termination of the agreement allowed, what are the consequences of that termination (both monetary and nonmonetary), and what are the remedies the parties may seek– specific, common law, or both.
