Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer
Plone Site
  • News
  • Events

    • —2025 Annual Meeting of the State Bar of Texas
    • Member Benefits

      • —The Texas Journal of Business Law (Archive)
        • —Volume 49, Issue 3 (Spring 2021)
        • —Volume 49, Issue No 2 (Fall 2020)
        • —Volume 49, Issue No 1 (Summer 2020)
        • —Volume 48, Issue No. 3 (Spring 2020)
        • —Volume 48, Issue No. 2 (Fall 2019)
        • —More
      • —Practical Business Law (Journal)
        • —CLE Materials
          • —2025 Essentials of Business Law
          • —2024 Advanced Business Law
          • —2024 Choice, Governance & Acquisitions of Entities
          • —2024 UT Law CLE 50th Annual Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Institute
          • —2024 Essentials of Business Law
          • —More
        • —Legislation
          • —2025 - 89th Legislative Session
          • —2023 - 88th Legislative Session
          • —2021 - 87th Legislative Session
          • —2019 - 86th Legislative Session
          • —2017 - 85th Legislative Session
          • —More
        • —Webinars & Podcasts
          • —Do Businesses Deserve Their Own Court System? Half of the Country Has Them. Why Doesn’t Texas? Yall-itics: March 5th, 2023
        • —Newsletters
        • Resource Centers

          • —Artificial Intelligence
            • —FTC's First Attempt to Crack Down on AI-Generated Fake Reviews
          • —Securities Law
            • —Federal court strikes down Missouri investment rule targeted at 'woke politics'
            • —2020 EXAMINATION PRIORITIES Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations
            • —2020 Risk Monitoring and Examination Priorities Letter
            • —Fifth Circuit issues preliminary injunction against Texas Bar for unconstitutional actions
            • —Fifth Circuit issues preliminary injunction against Texas Bar for unconstitutional actions (LA)
            • —More
          • —Legal Opinions Resource Center
            • —Business Courts
              • —The new Texas Business Court: What it is and how to use it
              • —Countdown to Business Courts: Six Must-Know Rules
            • —Business Drafting
              • —Non-Profit Entity Forms
              • —Corporate Forms
              • —LLC Forms
              • —Partnership Forms
            • —Practice Tips and Tools
              • —Bitcoin Explained
          • Committees
          • Sponsors & Offers
          • About

            • —The Business Law Section Mission
            • Legislation Dashboard
            • Home
            • News
            • Events
            • Member Benefits
            • Resource Centers
            • Committees
            • Sponsors & Offers
            • About
            • Legislation Dashboard
            Log in
            Site MapContact
            Home

            Search results

            5 results
            Sort by:

            Drafting & Negotiating Complex Commercial Agreements

            Supply chain disruptions have taken center stage in the news cycle in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, bringing commercial agreements into the international spotlight. In this volatile commercial environment, attorneys have a unique opportunity to bring order to chaos by providing valuable legal insight into their clients’ procurement and supply chain relationships. This article identifies several key considerations for drafting and negotiating complex commercial agreements specifically through the lens of potential supply chain issues. For simplicity’s sake, this article focuses primarily on customers and suppliers, but attorneys should also pay close attention to the various other parties in the overall supply chain network, such as raw materials providers, distributors, resellers, and logistics and warehousing providers. Generally, the party purchasing goods or services is referred to as the “customer” and the party providing goods or services is referred to as the “supplier” throughout this article, but other defined terms may be a better fit for different types of agreements (e.g., “Client” or “Purchaser” may be used for the party purchasing goods or services, and “Service Provider” or “Seller” may be used for the party providing goods or services). This article does not contain an exhaustive list of provisions that should be included in a commercial agreement. Complex commercial agreements are just that – complex! – and should be specifically tailored to the business arrangement between the parties. However, the standard elements addressed in this article should generally apply across a variety of types of agreements.
            Read More…

            When is a Forfeiture Clause a Non-Compete?

            For Texas lawyers who draft non-competes for employers, there are two essential things to remember. First, putting the non-compete in the form of a forfeiture clause won’t necessarily avoid the requirements of the non-compete statute. Second, regardless of what you call it, it is unlikely that a Texas court will enforce a forfeiture clause that functions as an unreasonably broad non-compete. So you might as well make the scope of the discouraged competition reasonable.
            Read More…

            It's Not Safe Out There: Consideration of Contract Terms that Avoid or Limit Liability and Legal Expense

            This is the PowerPoint slide deck for the presentation.
            Read More…

            Contract Drafting

            This article is a short but comprehensive guide into all aspects of contract drafting.
            Read More…

            How To Interpret a Complex Business Contract

            The purpose of this paper is to suggest a methodology for interpreting a complex business contract (or any contract, for that matter) by interpreting it as a whole, rather than solely by seizing upon certain language within the contract. This paper assumes that the reader has from law school and legal practice become familiar with basic principles of contract formation, drafting and interpretation. An easy-to-read and excellent resource book on these topics is Charles M. Fox, WORKING WITH CONTRACTS: WHAT LAW SCHOOL DOESN’T TEACH YOU (Practicing Law Institute (2nd ed. 2008), available inexpensively at Amazon.com and from numerous other sources. The author illustrates the process by reference to a hypothetical, complex business transaction in which an existing contract places many restrictions on the ability of a party to that contract to do other transactions (directly or through its subsidiaries), including the hypothetical transaction. The task is to identify the salient contractual provisions in the existing, restrictive contract, interpret it as a whole, and reach conclusions regarding the intent of the parties to the restrictive contract. The purpose of the task is to determine whether or not a proposed new transaction would be permitted.
            Read More…
            We're Here to Help. Get in Touch.
            Whether you need guidance on an emerging legal issue, want to learn more about member benefits, or have general inquiries about the Business Law Section - we're here to help.
            Contact Us

            The Business Law Section of the State Bar of Texas provides resources in the fields of corporate, securities, commercial, banking and bankruptcy law for attorneys in the State of Texas.

            Membership Benefits
            • Webinars & Podcasts
            • Legislation
            • Newsletters
            • Texas Journal of Business Law
            • CLE Materials
            Resource Centers
            • Artificial Intelligence
            • Business Drafting
            • Securities Law
            • Practice Tips & Tools
            • Legal Opinions
            • Business Courts
            Outside Resources
            • State Bar of Texas
            • Texas Bar CLE
            • UT Law CLE
            Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicySite Map