Search results

2 results

April 1, 2020Joseph T. McClure

A New Trend in Securities Fraud: Punishing People Who Do Bad Things

This article seeks to articulate a distinct view of federal securities law as it is increasingly used in non-traditional enforcement actions commenced to punish corporate bad behavior. This paper argues that these non-traditional enforcement mechanisms should be viewed with skepticism. This skepticism should not be misinterpreted as cynicism, as the author believes that these non-traditional enforcement actions are beneficial vehicles to accomplish the admirable governmental objective of “punishing people who do bad things.” However, the author recognizes that such use of securities law does not fall into a category of clearly defined criminal law and carries a significant risk of abuse. The author also recognizes the “admirable governmental objective” may be thwarted when it comes to private companies. Finally, the author is uneasy with the societal values conveyed when the government sanctions corporate misbehavior in the name of protecting shareholders from deception.

Crowdfunding from Texas Crowds

The Texas Intrastate Crowdfunding Rules have flexibility that neither the comparable federal statute nor the proposed federal rulemaking have. The Texas rules allow all of the intermediaries operating crowdfunding portals to take compensation. That should encourage the formation of portals and registration with the Texas State Securities Board. In contrast, the definitions and operational limits on both federal Funding Portals and intermediaries in Rule 506(c) offerings exempted under ’34 Act Section 3(h) cannot take compensation. The Texas issuer’s offering exemption provides for a larger ceiling for the investment by each individual investor and has no ceiling on investments by Accredited Investors. In contrast, federal statutory provisions for crowdfunding offerings have ceilings, whether the investors are Accredited Investors or not and all investors must be Accredited Investors in Rule 506(c) offerings made on portals. The Texas rules will likely disqualify fewer issuers than the federal statutory provisions for crowdfunding or the regulatory requirements for Rule 506(c) offerings do. And, the simpler set of disqualifying events or conditions under Texas rules impose a lesser burden in ensuring compliance with the exemption than exists under the federal exemptions.