Interpretive and Exemptive Letters
Texas State Securities Board's Interpretive and Exemption Letters from January 7, 1993 through March 5, 2012.
Atlanta Marriott Marquis II Limited Partnership §5(G) 11/21/1997
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:01 AM
§ 5.G unavailable for the proposed sale or transfer of limited partnership interests of one Delaware limited partnership (the “Surviving Partnership”) in connection with the merger of another Delaware limited partnership (the “Merging Partnership”) with and into the Surviving Partnership, because neither the Surviving Partnership nor the Merging Partnership is a corporation. Also, the staff declined to recommend no action to register the offer and sale of the limited partnership interests of the Surviving Partnership to the Texas residents that are limited partners of the Merging Partnership.
Austin Diagnostic Clinic Association, §7; §12; no action recommended, 3/24/1997
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:01 AM
No action recommended to require registration of the distribution of limited partnership interests as bonus compensation to existing shareholders of Austin Diagnostic Clinic Association, a Texas professional association (“ADCA”), in connection with the conversion of ADCA to a Texas limited partnership, where no communication or remuneration will be paid in connection with the distribution, the recipients will not be obligated to pay any consideration or provide any additional services for the interests, the transferability of the interests will be restricted, and the recipients will make various typical investment representations. The staff also recommended no action to require registration of ADCA as a dealer in connection with the distribution.
Beazer Homes U.S.A. Inc. §6(F) §7 Rule 111.2 No Action Recommended 1/27/1994
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:01 AM
§6.F available for issuance of senior notes by an issuer approved for listing on NYSE which were guaranteed by issuer’s subsidiaries. The subsidiary guarantees were unconditional and not separately tradable from the senior notes. No action recommended to require registration of guarantees of senior notes by issuer’s subsidiaries.
Bryan-College Station Financial Holding Company, §7; §12; no action recommended, 10/17/1997
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:01 AM
No action recommended to require registration of the issuance of shares of a proposed thrift holding company conducting a public offering registered with the SEC in connection with a reorganization of First Federal Savings Bank (“First Federal”), a thrift regulated and supervised by the United States Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”). The reorganization, which will involve a reverse triangular merger by which First Federal will become the wholly-owned subsidiary of the holding company, is subject to approval by the shareholders of First Federal and by the OTS. The holding company will also be subject to regulation by the OTS. The proceeds of the public offering will be used in part to pay cash to shareholders of First Federal that do not elect to exchange their shares for shares of the holding company. The staff also recommended no action to require registration of the holding company and its executive officers and directors as dealers in connection with the offering and the reorganization.
C.S.B. Bancshares, Inc., §5.G, 5/19/1993
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:01 AM
§5.G available for reorganization by merger of a bank into a single bank holding company in which shareholders of the bank may exchange their shares of bank stock for either stock of the bank holding company or subordinated debentures to be issued by the bank holding company.
California Baptist Foundation $10,000,000 Church Loan Fund, §6.J, 3/10/1997
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§6.J available for the sale of “collateralized certificates of participation,” which are debt instruments, issued and payable by the California Baptist Foundation, a California non-profit corporation.
CBOE Holdings, Inc., §7; §12; no action recommended, 7/3/1909
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration of common stock of holding company to be issued to members of subsidiary Chicago Board Options Exchange Inc. in emutualization and also to be issued to members of the Chicago Board of Trade in settlement of a class action lawsuit.
Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, §5.E, 1/7/1993
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.E available for Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), where Plan permits the company’s stockholders (and the company’s customers in Vermont) to purchase additional shares of the company’s stock without paying commissions. Plan participants could choose to reinvest dividends and/or contribute cash to purchase shares.
Citibank, N.A. – Investment Adviser Activities, §12; no action recommended, 4/15/1998
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration or notice filing by Citibank, N.A., a national banking association (“Citibank”), as an investment adviser in connection with the activities of its affiliate Citicorp Investment Services (“CIS”) in Texas. CIS is registered as a general securities dealer, and in the process of registering as an investment adviser, in Texas. Citibank is not registered as an investment adviser in Texas and has not made a notice filing regarding its federal investment-adviser registration. CIS does not directly provide investment advisory services in Texas, but refers clients to Citibank to provide the services.
City of Fergus Falls, Minnesota, §5.M; §6.J; Rule 139.15, 3/1/1996
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.M available for revenue bond offering by a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. Issuer was to use the offering proceeds to loan funds to a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation that operates healthcare facilities. The bonds were supported by a guaranty by an affiliated 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation. §6.J available for the guaranty.
ClearOne Communications, Inc., §5.E; §7; no action recommended; Rule 109.1, 7/13/1905
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration of stock to be issued to Texas residents in connection with a settlement of securities class action lawsuit, even though class of persons to receive stock included former as well as current stockholders.
Coil Tubing Technologies, Inc., §7; no action recommended, 9/15/1910
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration of additional shares of Coil Tubing stock to be issued in connection with settlement of lawsuit. Coil Tubing spin- off from Grifco resulted in under-issuance of shares of Coil Tubing, after which Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation/Depository Trust Company unilaterally created additional shares of Coil Tubing stock to rectify and lawsuit resulted.
Collins/Bay Island Securities LLC, §5.H; §12; Rule 109.5; Rule 139.22, 7/1/1902
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
Rule 109.3 [now Rule 109.5] exemption from registration as dealer available where company would solicit investments solely from financial institutions or other institutional investors described in former Rule 109.3 [now Rule 109.5], if such persons are acting for their own account or as bona fide trustees. No action recommended to require registration of company or its agents soliciting investments from family offices with assets in excess of $500 million.
CompUSA Inc., §7; no action recommended, 6/15/1993
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration of guarantees to be issued by subsidiaries of CompUSA Inc. in connection with CompUSA’s issuance of senior subordinated notes to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Such guarantees would not be sold separately from the notes and would not require any additional consideration to receive.
Cookson America, Inc., §5.I(b); Rule 109.13(g), 4/10/1996
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.I(b) available for sales of interests in a 401(k) savings plan and master savings trust offered to employees of the plan’s sponsor and its subsidiaries. The savings plan would permit such employees to invest in mutual funds or the plan sponsor’s parent company. Rule 109.13(g) available to exempt plan sponsor and its subsidiaries and employees from dealer registration requirements.
CoreStates Securities Corp, §5.H; Rule 109.3 [now Rule 109.4(b)], 10/13/1997
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.H available for those members of the sales force of a registered broker-dealer in Texas who confine their activities to dealing solely with institutional customers of the kinds described in §5.H and Rule 109.3 [now 109.4(b)].
Corpus Christi National Bank, §7; no action recommended, 1/7/1993
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
No action recommended to require registration of shares of common stock of MCorp Financial, Inc., a debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11 of theBankruptcy Code (“MCorp”), to be sold by MCorp to a bank as an intermediary for the shareholders of the bank. Such sale had been approved by the bankruptcycourt. Although MCorp was not a trustee, presumably within the meaning of §5.A], as debtor-in-possession, MCorp had similar rights, powers and duties to a trustee in bankruptcy.
County of Mesa, Colorado, §5.M; §7; no action recommended, 2/17/1994
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.M available for revenue bond offering by a political subdivision of the State of Colorado. Issuer was to re-loan the offering proceeds to a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation that operates hospitals. No action was recommended to require registration of the note to be issued by the non-profit corporation.
Credit Suisse First Boston Capital LLC, §12; No Action Recommended, 4/12/2001
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
Dealer registration required for a company operating an OTC derivatives business effecting transactions through registered dealer affiliated with the company.
CRF Lodging Company, L.P., §5.F; §5.G, 2/6/1998
by General Counsel of TSSB
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2019 02:02 AM
§5.F and §5.G unavailable for the proposed offer and sale of units of limited partnership interests in CRF Lodging Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Company”), and unsecured notes to partners in up to six limited partnerships (the “Consolidating Partnerships”) in connection with the consolidation of the Consolidating Partnerships so that they would become wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Concurrently with the consolidation, the general partner of the Company will conduct an initial public offering of its shares; the offering will be exempt under §6.F, and those shares will be federal covered securities under Rule 114.4(b)(2). The staff declined to recommend no action to register the offer and sale of units and notes by the Company and noted that any employees or agents of the Company assisting the offer and sale of units and notes must be registered as dealers unless the offers and sales will be effected by a Texas-registered dealer.
- Previous 20 items
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 12
- Next 20 items