Search results
11 results
Sort by:
May 1, 2019Megan Moody Barcak
No Conspiracy or Complicity Liability When a Statute Draws Specific Lines As to Its Extraterritorial Application
U.S. v. Hoskins, 902 F. 3d 69 (2nd Cir. 2018)
June 1, 2016Joseph Ty Vessels
Libel and Slander—Privilege in Reports Regarding Possible Criminal Activity
Shell Oil Co. v. Writt, No. 13-0552, 2015 WL 2328678 (Tex. May 15, 2015)
March 1, 2013Texas Journal of Business Law
Volume 45, Issue 2 of the Texas Journal of Business Law
The entire issue, all in a single file.
March 1, 2013Joel Androphy, Ashley Gargour
The Intersection of the Dodd-Frank Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: What All Practitioners, Whistleblowers, Defendants, and Corporations Need to Know
With the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer ProtectionAct (Dodd-Frank Act),1 government authorities are no longer the only ones with a monetaryinterest in ferreting out those who violate federal laws. Specifically, section 922 of the DoddFrank Act provides a whistleblower program that rewards individuals who assist the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (SEC) in uncovering securities violations, including ForeignCorrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations. Because the Dodd-Frank Act allows individualwhistleblowers to reap significant benefits by reporting offenders and because the SEC andDepartment of Justice (DOJ) have increased FCPA prosecutions in recent years, globalcompanies and their employees, especially those in the pharmaceutical and medical deviceindustry, should understand how the Dodd-Frank Act and the FCPA intersect.
November 7, 2025Michael Clark
Navigating Change: the FCPA Under the Current Administration
These are the presentation slides.
November 6, 202100796198, Byron F. Egan
Audit Response Letters and Reserve Issues
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (H.R. 3763) (“SOX”) was enacted as a means to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws. SOX and the rules enacted thereafter affect how issuers of securities make disclosures, the protocols auditors use to audit their financial statements, and how lawyers respond to auditor requests for information regarding issuer loss contingencies. Among other things, SOX amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”). Although SOX does have some specific provisions, and generally establishes some important public policy changes, it has been implemented in large part through rules adopted and to be adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), which have impacted auditing standards and have increased scrutiny on auditors’ independence and procedures to verify company financial statement positions and representations. Further, while SOX is by its terms generally applicable only to public companies, its principles are being applied by the marketplace to privately held companies and nonprofit entities.
November 8, 2018Darin W. Schultz
Acquisition Finance: Loan Market Trends in the Energy Sector
“Acquisition Finance” involves the interaction of two separate but related transactions. First, there is a purchase and sale of an asset or legal entity between a buyer and a seller that is evidenced by a purchase and sale agreement (the “PSA”). Second, there is a financing arrangement between a borrower (i.e., the buyer) and one or more financing providers that is evidenced by a credit or loan agreement, the proceeds of which are used to finance the acquisition (the “Financing”). In order to fully appreciate the current loan market trends in the acquisition finance space, it is important to know how the market has evolved in recent years.
March 15, 2018George P. Bernhardt
How To Deal With Disasters For Your Office and Your Clients
Natural disasters seem to be becoming more prevalent each year. Attorneys must prepare their practices for such disasters and may also need to advise clients of how to prepare for disasters. This article provides advice and guidance on how to put a plan in place to prepare for and manage a natural disaster in order to minimize damages suffered by your or your clients’ businesses.
November 8, 2013Brent Benoit
FCPA Internal Investigations: Key Concepts and Considerations
The globalization of national economies has created an increasing number of cross-border business opportunities for American companies. As a result, more and more businesses find at least some portion of their operations based or conducted in various foreign countries.1 This expansion into foreign markets creates significant opportunities for companies, but it also gives rise to a number of challenges. Foreign markets are often subject to different laws, customs, and standards and companies must take these issues into account to successfully operate. One of the most significant issues that companies must confront when conducting business operations in foreign countries is compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). In general, the FCPA prohibits payments and other transfers of value to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining a commercial advantage.3 While such a practice would be naturally viewed as improper within the United States, corruption is more common in many foreign countries, and is often tolerated or allowed to flourish due to weak enforcement of local anti-corruption laws.4 The FCPA attempts to fill any such enforcement gaps by prohibiting companies subject to the law from engaging in such practices.
November 2, 2012David E. Harrell Jr., Ann Ryan Robertson
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act - Is the Cover-Up Worse than the Crime?
Brief FCPA Primer FCPA Enforcement Update FCPA Trends for 2012 Recent, Notable FCPA Cases FCPA Legal Developments Collateral Consequences International Enforcement Merger/Acquisition Concerns Third Party Concerns What To Expect From An FCPA Investigation.
October 23, 2009Charles Henry (Hank) Still
Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine and Responses to Auditor Requests for Information
Analyzing whether communications between an attorney and client are subject to discovery in litigation, including a criminal and/or enforcement proceeding and shareholder derivative litigation, requires an analysis of two separate and distinct legal doctrines: attorney-client privilege and the "work-product" doctrine.